

Gregory A. Wray
*
======================================= Arkarua
|
|====================================== Helicoplacus
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Edrioasteroidea
<<===|
| ==================== Crinoidea (sea lilies and feather stars)
| ==Pelmatozoa=|
| | ==================== Blastoidea
| |
======| ====== Ophiuroidea (brittle-stars and basket-stars)
| |
| ==Asterozoa=|= ?== Concentricycloidea (sea daisies)
| | |
==Eleutherozoa=| ====== Asteroidea (seastars and cushion stars)
|
| ====== Holothuroidea (sea cucumbers)
==Echinozoa=|
====== Echinoidea (sea urchins and sand dollars)
Summary phylogenetic hypothesis of the Echinodermata, based on David and Mooi (1997), Littlewood et al. (1997), and Sumrall and Sprinkle (1997). Note that the phylogenetic position of most fossil echinoderms is still uncertain, and a number of additional extinct taxa will be added to this tree in the future.
Containing clade(s): Metazoa
Echinoderms form a well-defined and highly-derived clade of metazoans. They have attracted much attention due to their extensive fossil record, ecological importance in the marine realm, intriguing adult morphology, unusual biomechanical properties, and experimentally manipulable embryos. The approximately 7,000 species of extant echinoderms fall into five well-defined clades: Crinoidea (sea lilies and feather stars), Ophiuroidea (basket stars and brittle stars), Asteroidea (starfishes), Echinoidea (sea urchins, sand dollars, and sea biscuits), and Holothuroidea (sea cucumbers). The phylogenetic position of the Concentricycloidea (sea daisies; 2 species), remains controversial (Baker et al. 1986; Smith 1988b; Pearse and Pearse 1994; Mooi et al. 1997).
Approximately 13,000 echinoderm species are known from the fossil record. All Mesozoic and Cenozoic forms clearly fall into the five extant clades, but the Paleozoic record contains numerous distinct and often bizarre forms that have been placed into approximately 15 additional classes. Phylogenetic relationships, and in some cases status as monophyletic groups, remains unclear for the extinct classes. Unquestionable echinoderms first appear in the fossil record during the mid-Cambrian. Arkarua, a possible echinoderm, has been described from the Vendian (latest Proterozoic) (Gehling 1987).
Synapomorphies of the Echinodermata
Echinoderms are among the most distinctive of all animal phyla. Inclusion in the phylum is readily diagnosable on basis of the four synapomorphies below. Most of these features are present, or can be inferred, even in the earliest fossils. Together, these synapomorphies define much of what makes the functional biology of echinoderms distinctive from that of other metazoans.
1. Calcitic skeleton composed of many ossicles. The biomineral matrix of echinoderm skeletons is composed of calcium carbonate and several proteins. The calcite is deposited as numerous tiny crystals, but all of them lie on the same crystal axis within an ossicle. For this reason, ossicles are birefringent under polarizing light. Ossicles are not solid, but have a sponge-like microstructure called stereom that is unique to the phylum. Embryologically, echinoderm ossicles are a true endoskeleton, since they are produced by mesenchymal cells and are usually covered by epidermis. Functionally, however, the majority of ossicles act more like an exoskeleton, lying just under the epidermis and enclosing most other tissues in a flexible but tough covering.
2. Water vascular system. The water vascular system performs many important functions in echinoderms, including locomotion, respiration, and feeding; in addition, most sensory neurons are located at the termini of podia (tubefeet) which are part of this organ system. The water vascular system may have evolved from simple tentacular systems similar to those in other deuterostome phyla, such as the tentacles of pterobranch hemichordates. However, there are many derived features of the water vascular system in echinoderms, including: an embryological origin from left mesocoel, podia arranged along branches (ambulacra), and a central circumesophageal ring.
3. Mutable collagenous tissue. The ossicles of echinoderms are connected by ligaments composed predominantly of collagen. The material properties of this connective tissue are mutable on short timescales, under neuronal control. Ligaments are normally "locked" (rigid), but can be temporarily "unlocked" (loosened). This provides some interesting mechanical advantages, including the ability to maintain a variety of postures with no muscular effort. In holothuroids, which contain only microscopic ossicles, the entire body wall contains mutable collagenous tissue.
4. Pentaradial body organization in adults.
The adults of all extant echinoderms are radially symmetrical. A
superficial bilateral organization has evolved twice, in irregular
echinoids and holothuroids, but is based on an underlying five-fold
organization of skeleton and most organ systems, and is clearly secondary.
Higher order radial symmetry (e.g., seven-fold or nine-fold) has evolved on
several occasions, and is also clearly a secondary modification. The
evolutionary origins of five-fold symmetry remain obscure. Some early
Paleozoic echinoderms are not radially symmetrical (e.g., carpoids and
helicoplacoids), while a possible echinoderm from the Vendian (Arkarua) has
five-fold radial body organization.
Plesiomorphies and other features
1. Marine habit.
All extant echinoderms live in the ocean, and there is no fossil evidence
of any exception to this. Within the marine realm, echinoderms occupy
nearly all habitats, where they often constitute a major proportion of the
biomass.
2. Pelago-benthic life cycle.
With rare exception, echinoderms are gonochoric (separate sexes) with no
overt sexual dimorphism. Fertilization is almost always external.
Ancestrally (and still, typically), the life cycle is complex, with a
free-living larva that is planktotrophic (grazes on unicellular algae).
Larvae are plesiomorphically bilaterally symmetrical, have a recurved gut
and transparent ectoderm, and feed by upstream particle capture using the
ciliated band. Metamorphosis is typically radical and occurs during
settlement onto the benthos.
3. Coelomate.
Echinoderms form their coeloms as outpocketings from the archenteron
(embryonic gut), a process called enterocoely. In most species, the
coeloms are trimerous, and initially bilaterally symmetrical. The fates of
the various coelomic compartments vary among echinoderms, but some features
seem broadly similar and may reflect a common evolutionary origin deep
within the phylum: left mesocoel gives rise to most or all of the water
vascular system, and one or both somatocoels form the lining of the body
cavity.
4. Deuterostome.
Like some related phyla, the blastopore (site where gastrulation begins) in
echinoderm embryos becomes the larval anus; the larval mouth is a secondary
opening. In some extant forms, the larval mouth is preserved as the adult
mouth, while in others the entire digestive system is re-plumbed during
metamorphosis and a new mouth and anus form.
5. Simple hemal/excretory system.
The hemal and excretory systems of echinoderms are linked into what
Nielsen (1996) calls the "axial complex". This organ system shows
similarities, and may be homologous, to those of other deuterostome phyla.
In echinoderms, it is composed of: a thickened vessel (the "heart") lacking
an endothelium and surrounded by a pericardium; a region where
ultrafiltration occurs via podocytes; a closed circulatory system; and an
opening to the external environment called the madreporite.
6. Decentralized nervous system.
The arrangment of the central nervous sytem of echinoderms is quite
different from that in other deuterostomes. Radial nerves run under each
of the ambulacra, and contain the cell bodies of almost all motor neurons
and interneurons. A central nerve ring surrounds the gut, and is composed
primarily of fiber tracks connecting the radial nerves. No known
echinoderm contains anything that could be called a brain, although ganglia
are present along the radial nerves in some echinoderms. Unlike most
bilaterian phyla, echinoderms lack any trace of cephalization, and have no
specialized sense organs. Sensory neurons are located primarily within the
ectoderm of podia, and send axons to the radial nerves.
Phylogenetic relationships among the five extant classes have been the subject of considerable debate. Renewed interest in resolving this problem during the past decade has greatly narrowed the number of likely topologies (Littlewood et al. 1997). It is generally agreed that the lineage leading to the Crinoidea branched most basally, and that the Echinoidea and Holothuroidea are extant sister clades. Debate now centers on whether the Ophiuroidea and Asteroidea form a clade. The two best-supported hypotheses are:

The "Asterozoan" hypothesis was first proposed by Bather (1900), and has recently been supported by the work of Mooi and David (1997). The alternative hypothesis dates back to MacBride (1906). More recently, (Smith 1988a) advocated the same topology, and proposed the name Cryptosyringida for the clade (Ophuroidea + Echinoidea + Holothuroidea). These two hypotheses are preferred, to a nearly equal degree, by molecular analyses (18S and 26S rRNA sequences) and "total evidence" analyses (summarized in Littlewood et al. 1997). Mitochondrial gene order seems to support the Asterozoan hypothesis (Smith et al. 1993), but information from crinoids is needed to clarify the polarity of the character transformations.
Including fossil taxa, the number of echinoderm classes rises to approximately 20. The lack of a clear understanding of homologies among ossicles in various extinct classes has hampered attempts to reconstruct their phylogenetic relationships (Mooi and David 1997), and it is fair to say that much work remains to be done. Analyses by Smith and Paul (1984), Smith (1988a), and Sumrall and Sprinkle (1997) are the most comprehensive and rigorous available for Paleozoic echinoderms.
Bather, F.A. 1900. The Echinodermata. Part iii, A and C of A
Treatise on Zoology (R.R. Lankester, ed.). Black, London.
Brusca, R.C., and G.J. Brusca. 1990. Invertebrates. Sinauer,
Sunderland MA.
David, B. and R. Mooi. 1997. Major events in the evolution of
echinoderms viewed by the light of embryology. In Echinoderms:
San Francisco (R. Mooi and M. Telford, eds.). Balkema,
Rotterdam. In press.
Gehling, J.G. 1987. Earliest known echinoderm -- a new Ediacaran
fossil from the Pound Subgroup of South Australia.
Alcheringa 11: 337-345.
Hyman, L.H. 1955. The Invertebrates, vol. iv, Echinodermata.
McGraw-Hill, New York.
Littlewood, D.T.J. 1995. Echinoderm class relationships revisited.
Pages 19-28 in Echinoderm Research 1995 (R. H. Emson,
A. B. Smith, and A. C. Campbell, eds.). Balkema, Rotterdam.
Littlewood, D.T.J., A. B. Smith, K. A. Clough, and R. H. Emson.
1997. The interrelationships of the echinoderm classes:
morphological and molecular evidence. Biol. J. Linn.
Soc. 61: 409-438.
MacBride, E.W. 1906. Echinodermata. In The Cambridge Natural
History (S.F. Harmer and A.E. Shipley, eds.). MacMillan,
London.
Mooi, R., F.W.E. Rowe, and B. David. 1997. Application of a
theory of axial and extraxial skeletal homologies to
concentricycloid morphology. In Echinoderms: San Francisco
(R. Mooi and M. Telford, eds.). Balkema, Rotterdam.
In press.
Mooi, R., and B. David. 1997. Skeletal homologies of echinoderms.
Pal. Soc. Papers, in press.
Nielsen, C. 1995. Animal Evolution: Interrelationships of the
Living Phyla. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Paul, C.R.C. and A.B. Smith. 1984. The early radiation and phylogeny
of echinoderms. Biol. Rev. 59: 443-481.
Pearse, V.B., and J.S. Pearse. 1994. Echinoderm phylogeny and
the place of the concentricyloids. Pages 121-126 in
Echinoderms through Time (B. David, A. Guille, J.-P.
Féral, and M. Roux, eds.). Balkema, Rotterdam.
Raff, R.A., K.G. Field, M.T. Ghiselin, D.J. Lane, G.J. Olsen,
N.R. Pace, A.L. Parks, B.P. Parr, and E.C. Raff. 1988.
Molecular analysis of distant phylogenetic relationships
in echinoderms. Pages 29-41 in Echinoderm Phylogeny
and Evolutionary Biology (C.R.C. Paul and A.B. Smith,
eds.). Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Rowe, F.W.E., A.N.Baker, and H.E.S. Clark. 1988. The morphology,
development and taxonomic status of Xyloplax Baker,
Rowe and Clark 1986 (Echinodermata:Concentricycloidea),
with the description of a new species. Phil. Trans.
R. Soc. Lond. B 233: 431-459.
Smith, A.B. 1984. Classification of the Echinodermata. Paleontology
27:431-459.
Smith, A.B. 1988a. Fossil evidence for the relationship of extant
echinoderm classes and their times of divergence. Pages
85-97 in Echinoderm Phylogeny and Evolutionary Biology
(C.R.C. Paul and A.B. Smith, eds.). Clarendon Press,
Oxford.
Smith, A.B. 1988b. To group or not to group: taxonomic position
of Xyloplax. Pages 17-23 in Proceedings of the 6th
International Echinoderm Conference (R. D. Burke, P.
V. Mladenov, P. Lambert, R. L. Parsley, eds.). Balkema,
Rotterdam.
Smith, M.J., A. Arndt, S. Gorski, and E. Fajber. 1993. The phylogeny
of echinoderm classes based on mitochondrial gene rearrangements.
J. Mol. Evol. 36:545-554.
Sumrall, C. and J. Sprinkle. 1997. Phylogenetic analysis of living
Echinodermata based on primitive fossil taxa. In Echinoderms:
San Francisco (R. Mooi and M. Telford, eds.). Balkema,
Rotterdam. In press.
Wada, H., and N. Satoh. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships among
extant classes of echinoderms, as inferred from sequences
of 18S RNA, coincide with relationships deduced from
the fossil record. J. Mol. Evol. 38:41-49.
Gregory A. Wray
E-mail: gwray@duke.edu.
Duke University
Department Of Zoology
Box 90325
Durham, NC 27708
Page copyright © 1999 Gregory A. Wray
First online 14 December 1999
Last saved 1 December 2000